• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
lawyers@rslaw.com.au (02) 9299 4912

Commercial Lawyers & Solicitors | North Shore | Sydney CBD

  • Home
  • Our Story
    • Our Community
    • Our Environment
  • Our Services
    • Business & Commercial
      • Starting A New Business
        • New Business Structures
      • Buying & Selling a Business
        • Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A)
        • Sale or Purchase of Shares in a Private Company
        • FAQ – Sale of Business
        • FAQ – Purchase of Business
      • Business & Commercial Disputes
      • Corporate Governance & Asset Protection
      • Intellectual Property & IP Law
      • Contract Law
      • Climate Change, Energy Law & Carbon Trading
    • Debt Recovery
      • Debt Recovery Process
      • Enforcing a Debt or Judgment
      • Car Accidents & Motor Vehicle Claims
    • Probate, Estate Administration & Disputes
      • Applying for a Grant of Probate
      • FAQ’s – Contesting or Disputing a Will
      • FAQ’s – Executors and the Administration of Deceased Estates
    • Civil Disputes & Litigation
      • Business & Commercial Disputes
        • Shareholder Disputes
        • Partnership Disputes
        • Director’s Disputes
        • Contract & Property Disputes
      • Litigation
        • Commercial Litigation
      • Negligence
      • Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
    • Divorce & Family Law
      • FAQs – Family Law
      • Separation and Divorce in Australia
        • FAQs – Separating from my spouse
        • FAQs – Divorce
      • Property Orders and Financial Disputes
        • Consent Orders and Binding Financial Agreements
        • FAQs – Property and Financial Matters
        • FAQs – Spousal Maintenance
      • Children, Parenting Orders and Agreements
        • FAQs – Children and parenting matters
        • FAQs – Child Support
      • De facto Relationships and Separation
        • FAQs – De facto relationships
      • Family Court or Federal Circuit Court?
      • Collaborative Family Law
      • FAQs – Seeking advice from a family lawyer
    • Property & Conveyancing
      • Retail & Commercial Leases
      • Selling a Property
        • FAQ – Selling a Property
      • Buying a Property
        • FAQ – Buying a Property
      • Transferring Property in NSW
      • Property Owners Disputes
      • Caveats
      • Mortgages & Securities
      • Option Agreements
      • Electronic Conveyancing in NSW
    • Wills & Estate Planning
      • Drafting a Will
        • Children in Wills
        • Letter of Wishes
        • Digital Assets in a Will
      • Power of Attorney
      • Guardianship & Enduring Guardians
      • Elder Law
      • FAQ’s – Wills and Estates
    • Bankruptcy & Insolvency
      • Personal Bankruptcy
        • Bankruptcy Notices
        • Debt Agreements
        • Enforcing a Debt or Judgment
      • Company Insolvency
        • Creditor’s Statutory Demand
        • Creditor’s Petition
        • Winding Up or Deregistering a Company
    • Building & Construction
      • Building & Construction Contracts
      • Building & Construction Disputes
      • Security for Payments Act
    • Employment Law
    • Insurance Law
    • Public Notary
  • Online Quotes
    • Simple Will Quote
    • Debt Recovery Quote
    • Conveyancing Quote
  • Meet the Team
    • Stephen Rockliff
    • John Snelgrove
    • Nicole Rockliff
    • Dick Herman
    • Michelle Rockliff
    • Anthi Balafas
    • Cristian Fuenzalida
    • Jinny Kim
    • Nathan Rockliff
    • Peter Gell
    • Michael Hutson
  • News & Articles
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / News / Divorce & Family Law / Can the children decide which parent they wish to live with after their parents’ separation?

Can the children decide which parent they wish to live with after their parents’ separation?

When the Court makes parenting orders the paramount consideration in determining the children’s living arrangements is “what is the children’s best interests”. Section s60CC of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) sets out a list of the considerations which the Court takes into account in determining what is in the children’s best interests. One of the considerations is the child’s views including the child’s level of maturity and the weight that should be given to such views.

Up until recently, it has been thought that children particularly those of mature years were able to decide for themselves which parent they wished to live with once their parents separated.

The issue of the children’s views and the weight that the Court places upon such views was tested in the recent High Court case of Bondelmonte v Bondelmonte [2017] HCA 8 (1 March 2017) which involved the return of 2 teenage boys, aged almost 17 and 15 at the time of the trial, to Australia despite their strong wishes to live with their Father in New York.

The facts in Bondelmonte v Bondelmonte

The 2 older boys aged 15 and 13 were living with the Father and the daughter who was 10 years old was living with her Mother after separation.

When the boys were 16 and 14 years old the Father took them for a holiday to New York with the Mother’s consent. Whilst in New York, the Father decided to live there permanently. The 2 boys made it clear that they wanted to live with their Father in New York. The parenting orders which were in place at the time did not permit the Father to change the boys’ residence to the US. The Father never bought an application to relocate with the boys to New York but instead heavily relied on the fact that the boys had expressed a strong wish to remain living with him there. The Mother sought that the boys be returned to Australia. Her application was successful. The Father appealed the decision to the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia and subsequently to the High Court of Australia. Both appeals were dismissed.

Whilst the Court accepted the boys’ desire to live with their Father in New York, the Court was concerned that the boys did not appear to have given any thought to the effect of their separation from their Mother and their sister and how those relationships could be maintained. Another relevant consideration was the Father’s “flagrant disregard” of Court Orders. The Court was concerned that the Father’s attitude towards the responsibilities of parenthood would send a poor message to the boys, whose views, on the evidence, had been influenced by the Father’s actions.

What does this mean?

The above case clearly demonstrates that, despite popular belief to the contrary, the children’s views is merely one of the considerations the Court takes into account in determining what care arrangements are in the children’s best interests. Whilst the legislation sets out a comprehensive list of considerations in determining what is in the children’s best interests and one of them does give the children a voice in the above process, the children’s views are not always binding nor decisive when the Court makes parenting orders. Another thing to bear in mind is that the Court does not adopt a one size fits all approach in determining the children’s living arrangements after separation. Every child and its relationships with his or her parents as well as his or her siblings or other significant persons in his or her life are different. Therefore what may be regarded as being a good care arrangement for one child it does not necessarily mean that it may work for another family.

If you need advice on parenting matters and particularly what weight may be placed on any views that your child may have expressed in terms of his or her living arrangements, please contact our experienced family law solicitor Anthi Balafas of Rockliff Snelgrove Lawyers at (02) 9299 4912.

Author: Anthi Balafas

Disclaimer: this information is not intended to constitute legal advice. it is general information only and should not be relied upon in specialist family law advice. 

Primary Sidebar

Search

Categories

  • General
  • Employment Law
  • News
  • Probate, Estate Administration & Disputes
  • Property & Conveyancing
  • Services
  • Superannuation
  • Taxation
  • Uncategorised
  • Wills & Estate Planning
  • Bankruptcy & Insolvency
  • Building & Construction
  • Business & Commercial
  • Civil Disputes & Litigation
  • Debt Recovery
  • Divorce & Family Law
  • General Legal Services
  • Insurance Law

Online Enquiry

* indicates required field

News & Articles

Managing Employees in Australia given the Impact of COVID-19

We stress that due to the unprecedented nature of the pandemic and the very rapidly changing landscape, the guidelines below are general in nature and subject to change. Many of the laws that now apply to this situation were not written with regard to what is currently occurring. Therefore please exercise caution in relying on […]

Temporary Changes to Insolvency Laws in Australia due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Crisis

In a move aimed to lessen the economic impact on businesses and individuals caused by the Coronavirus pandemic, the Australian Government has introduced some changes to insolvency laws in Australia that apply to personal and corporate insolvency regimes. This includes a temporary increase to the threshold in which creditors can issue a statutory demand on […]

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update

Following on from the extensive reporting in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic we have implemented a number of protocols to enable the business to continue operating if a staff member or principal is diagnosed with the virus and/or the office needs to close for a period of time. Our staff and principals have adopted best […]

Footer

The Rockliff Snelgrove Difference

We have lawyers that are Accredited Specialist in Business Law and Family Law
We have over 100 years of combined experience
Our lawyers and consultants are experts in their field to enable us to give you tailored legal advice to suit your specific needs

Contact Us

  • Level 5, 50 King Street

    Sydney NSW 2000

  • (02) 9299 4912

Connect With Us

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Translate

Newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter for updates on our latest news, articles and special promotions!

Our website does not give legal advice. All materials are for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as legal advice. The use of this website is subject to our:
WEBSITE DISCLAIMER – PRIVACY POLICY – TERMS & CONDITIONS OF USE
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.Copyright © 2020 · Website hosted by Lift Legal · Log out