• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
[email protected] (02) 9299 4912

Lawyers Sydney | Solicitors in North Shore, Sydney

  • Home
  • Our Story
    • Our Community
    • Our Environment
  • Our Services
    • Sydney’s Premier Commercial Law Firm
      • Starting A New Business
        • New Business Structures
      • Buying & Selling a Business
        • Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A)
        • Sale or Purchase of Shares in a Private Company
        • FAQ – Sale of Business
        • FAQ – Purchase of Business
      • Commercial Dispute Resolution Law in Sydney
      • Corporate Governance & Asset Protection
      • Intellectual Property & IP Law
      • Contract Law
      • Climate Change, Energy Law & Carbon Trading
    • DEBT RECOVERY LAW
      • Debt Recovery Process
      • Enforcing a Debt or Judgment
      • Car Accidents & Motor Vehicle Claims
    • PROBATE LAW
      • Applying for a Grant of Probate
      • Contesting a Will
      • FAQ’s – Executors and the Administration of Deceased Estates
    • Civil Disputes & Litigation
      • Commercial Dispute Resolution Law in Sydney
        • Shareholder Disputes
        • Partnership Disputes
        • Director’s Disputes
        • Contract & Property Disputes
      • Litigation
        • COMMERCIAL LITIGATION LAWYERS IN SYDNEY
      • Negligence
      • Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
    • Property & Conveyancing
      • Retail & Commercial Leases
      • Selling a Property
        • FAQ – Selling a Property
      • Buying a Property
        • FAQ – Buying a Property
      • Transferring Property in NSW
      • Property Owners Disputes
      • Caveats
      • Mortgages & Securities
      • Option Agreements
      • Electronic Conveyancing in NSW
    • WILL DISPUTE LAW
      • Drafting a Will
        • Children in Wills
        • Letter of Wishes
        • Digital Assets in a Will
      • Power of Attorney
      • Guardianship & Enduring Guardians
      • Elder Law
      • FAQ’s – Wills and Estates
    • Bankruptcy & Insolvency
      • Personal Bankruptcy
        • Bankruptcy Notices
        • Debt Agreements
        • Enforcing a Debt or Judgment
      • Company Insolvency
        • Creditor’s Statutory Demand
        • Creditor’s Petition
        • Winding Up or Deregistering a Company
    • Building & Construction
      • Building & Construction Contracts
      • Building & Construction Disputes
      • Security for Payments Act
    • SYDNEY EMPLOYMENT LAW
    • Insurance Law
    • Public Notary
  • Online Quotes
    • Simple Will Quote
    • Debt Recovery Quote
    • Conveyancing Quote
  • Meet the Team
    • Michelle Rockliff
    • Nicole Rockliff
    • Sarah Mooney
    • Nathan Rockliff
    • Trudy David
  • News & Articles
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / News / Divorce & Family Law / Do both parents have a right to spend equal time with their children?

11/10/2012

Do both parents have a right to spend equal time with their children?

As a result of the amendments to the Family Law Act in 2006, concepts such as “equal shared parental responsibility”, “shared care”, “spending equal time” have received a lot of media attention and have been the subject of public debate as to what they all mean for separated parents and their relationships with their children.

shared parental responsibility

Many media reports have created an incorrect belief that if a parent has equal shared parental responsibility then this also translates to each parent having an entitlement to spend equal time with their children. To their surprise, many parents find that the social expectations created by the media as opposed to the legislative reality of these concepts, on the other hand, are very different in real life. This often creates confusion and disappointment as to what many parents’ rights and responsibilities are.

What is ‘parental responsibility’?

Firstly, let’s deal with the concept of parental responsibility. In accordance with the provisions of the Family Law Act, when the Court is asked to make a Parenting Order in relation to a child, the Court must apply a presumption that it is in ‘the best interests of the child’ for the child’s parents to have equal shared responsibility for the child. This usually applies in most cases unless there are allegations of abuse and domestic violence involving the child. Parental responsibility refers to each parent’s ability to make decisions about the long-term care, welfare and development of the child. It does not “confer a right” to a parent as to how much time a parent can or should spend with their child.

What determines the amount of time each parent will spend with the child?

Now let’s turn to the concept of “spending time with the children”. If the parents are unable to resolve the parenting arrangements on their own or through mediation, the Court has to follow the process which is set out in the Family Law Act, namely under section 60CC in order to determine what is in the “best interests of the child” when it comes to determining the periods of time each parent is to spend with the child. In addition, the Court can take into consideration whether a child spending equal time with each parent is reasonably practicable.

In some cases where both parents have very good communication, have similar values in relation to their children’s upbringing, are co-operative and flexible and can make a shared care arrangement work and lastly but not least, are able to place their children’s needs first, the Court may determine that such an arrangement is in the children’s best interests and then the Court can order that the children spend equal periods of time with each parent.

However, in many cases, other objective and subjective factors come into play which may render a shared care regime unworkable or not in the children’s best interests. Examples of this is where there is a high level of conflict between the two parents or where the child is of a very young age and has a primary attachment with one of the two parents or one parent has not had a great deal of involvement in the care of the child or where both parents live far apart from one another. In these cases, the Court may determine that it is in the children’s best interests that the child live primarily with one parent and spend significant periods of time with the other parent.

This list is not exhaustive of the types of considerations which the Court can have regard to when determining what is in the children’s best interests. In our experience, each case is different and unique and a careful case-by-case approach is required to be adopted when determining what is in the children’s best interests.

Contact us to find out more or to arrange a consultation with an experienced family lawyer in Sydney.

Primary Sidebar

Search

Categories

  • Wills & Estate Planning
  • Insurance Law
  • General Legal Services
  • Divorce & Family Law
  • Debt Recovery
  • Civil Disputes & Litigation
  • Business & Commercial
  • Building & Construction
  • Bankruptcy & Insolvency
  • General
  • Uncategorised
  • Taxation
  • Superannuation
  • Services
  • Property & Conveyancing
  • Probate, Estate Administration & Disputes
  • News
  • Employment Law

Online Enquiry

* indicates required field

News & Articles

Managing Employees in Australia given the Impact of COVID-19

  We stress that due to the unprecedented nature of the pandemic and the very rapidly changing landscape, the guidelines below are general in nature and subject to change. Many of the laws that now apply to this situation were not written with regard to what is currently occurring. Therefore please exercise caution in relying […]

Temporary Changes to Insolvency Laws in Australia due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Crisis

In a move aimed to lessen the economic impact on businesses and individuals caused by the Coronavirus pandemic, the Australian Government has introduced some changes to insolvency laws in Australia that apply to personal and corporate insolvency regimes. This includes a temporary increase to the threshold in which creditors can issue a statutory demand on […]

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update

Following on from the extensive reporting in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic we have implemented a number of protocols to enable the business to continue operating if a staff member or principal is diagnosed with the virus and/or the office needs to close for a period of time. Our staff and principals have adopted best […]

Footer

The Rockliffs Lawyers Difference

We provide pragmatic and practical solutions to your legal needs
We have decades of combined experience
Our lawyers and consultants are experts in their field to enable us to give you tailored legal advice to suit your specific needs

Contact Us

  • Suite 14, Level 26, 44 Market St Sydney NSW 2000
  • (02) 9299 4912

Connect With Us

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter for updates on our latest news, articles and special promotions!

Our website does not give legal advice. All materials are for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as legal advice. The use of this website is subject to our:
WEBSITE DISCLAIMER – PRIVACY POLICY – TERMS & CONDITIONS OF USE
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.Copyright © 2020 · Website hosted by Lift Legal Marketing · Log out