• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
[email protected] (02) 9299 4912

Lawyers Sydney | Solicitors in North Shore, Sydney

  • Home
  • Our Story
    • Our Community
    • Our Environment
  • Our Services
    • Sydney’s Premier Commercial Law Firm
      • Starting A New Business
        • New Business Structures
      • Buying & Selling a Business
        • Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A)
        • Sale or Purchase of Shares in a Private Company
        • FAQ – Sale of Business
        • FAQ – Purchase of Business
      • Commercial Dispute Resolution Law in Sydney
      • Corporate Governance & Asset Protection
      • Intellectual Property & IP Law
      • Contract Law
      • Climate Change, Energy Law & Carbon Trading
    • DEBT RECOVERY LAW
      • Debt Recovery Process
      • Enforcing a Debt or Judgment
      • Car Accidents & Motor Vehicle Claims
    • PROBATE LAW
      • Applying for a Grant of Probate
      • Contesting a Will
      • FAQ’s – Executors and the Administration of Deceased Estates
    • Civil Disputes & Litigation
      • Commercial Dispute Resolution Law in Sydney
        • Shareholder Disputes
        • Partnership Disputes
        • Director’s Disputes
        • Contract & Property Disputes
      • Litigation
        • COMMERCIAL LITIGATION LAWYERS IN SYDNEY
      • Negligence
      • Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
    • Property & Conveyancing
      • Retail & Commercial Leases
      • Selling a Property
        • FAQ – Selling a Property
      • Buying a Property
        • FAQ – Buying a Property
      • Transferring Property in NSW
      • Property Owners Disputes
      • Caveats
      • Mortgages & Securities
      • Option Agreements
      • Electronic Conveyancing in NSW
    • WILL DISPUTE LAW
      • Drafting a Will
        • Children in Wills
        • Letter of Wishes
        • Digital Assets in a Will
      • Power of Attorney
      • Guardianship & Enduring Guardians
      • Elder Law
      • FAQ’s – Wills and Estates
    • Bankruptcy & Insolvency
      • Personal Bankruptcy
        • Bankruptcy Notices
        • Debt Agreements
        • Enforcing a Debt or Judgment
      • Company Insolvency
        • Creditor’s Statutory Demand
        • Creditor’s Petition
        • Winding Up or Deregistering a Company
    • Building & Construction
      • Building & Construction Contracts
      • Building & Construction Disputes
      • Security for Payments Act
    • SYDNEY EMPLOYMENT LAW
    • Insurance Law
    • Public Notary
  • Online Quotes
    • Simple Will Quote
    • Debt Recovery Quote
    • Conveyancing Quote
  • Meet the Team
    • Michelle Rockliff
    • Nicole Rockliff
    • Sarah Mooney
    • Nathan Rockliff
    • Trudy David
  • News & Articles
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Uncategorised / Parenting Applications brought by Non-Parent Parties

28/08/2018

Parenting Applications brought by Non-Parent Parties

Do Grandparents, Relatives and other third parties have the right to seek parenting orders?

Apart from parents bringing parenting applications in relation to their children, the Court also has regard to all significant relationships a child has including those with their grandparents, new partners of their parents as well as their uncles and aunties.

Under s65C of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) any of the following persons can bring parenting applications:

  1. Either or both of the children’s parents
  2. The children themselves
  3. The children’s grandparents
  4. Any other person concerned with the care, welfare, and development of the children

Parenting Applications by Grandparents

The legislation has clearly created a right for grandparents to bring parenting applications which may include orders for the children to spend time with them or in appropriate cases for the grandchildren to live with them. In determining whether such parenting orders should be made in favour of grandparents, the overarching consideration which the Court must have regard to is what is in the children’s best interests.

Grandparents often bring parenting applications to spend time with their grandchildren in cases where there has been a breakdown in the relationship with their own children or with the other parent and as result they can no longer maintain meaningful relationships with their grandchildren. In other cases, grandparents can seek that the grandchildren live with them. Examples of such applications can occur where one parent has passed away or where either or both parents are not fit to care for the children due to a physical or mental incapacity.

Parenting Applications by relatives and other third parties

When other people such as step-parents or relatives wish to bring a parenting application firstly they need to establish to the Court that they are a person who is “concerned with the care, welfare and development” of the child. Secondly, they also need to demonstrate to the Court that it is in the child’s best interests for the child to spend time with them.

When considering applications brought by non-parent parties, the Court will look at closely the party’s relationship with the child and the role such person has played in the upbringing and the overall development of the child.

The case of Maldera v Orbel [2014] FamCACF 135 (30 July 2014) involved a parenting dispute between a maternal grandmother and a father. The Mother did not participate in the proceedings. It was accepted that the Mother did not have any meaningful involvement in the child’s life for a long time.  From the time of the child’s birth until the age of 4, the child either lived with his Mother or his parents. After many “negative and inappropriate” changes to the child’s family situation during his earlier years, from the age 4, the child started living with his maternal grandmother and continued to do until he was about 12 years of age. Previous Orders had been made for the child to live with the Maternal Grandmother and to spend time with each of his parents under different regimes.

Subsequently, the Father brought an application seeking that the child live with him. The Father argued that since the previous orders had been made, he was now married and had 3 children with his Wife. His life was now more settled than it was previously and argued that “he and his wife were now capable of having the child live with them”. The Court found that the Grandmother took good care of the child that the child did not express a view about where he wanted to live. The Court found that the child had good relationships with the Grandmother, the Father, and his wife as well as their three children.

Ultimately the Court held that whilst a child living with his or her natural parent is a relevant and important consideration in determining what is in the children’s best interests, it does not create a presumption or a preferential position that it is in the children’s best interests to be cared by a parent as opposed to a non-parent.

The important message from this case in the context of determining parenting applications which involve non-parent parties is that the Court will have regard to the quality of parenting offered to the child rather than simply rely on the fact that a child living with his or her natural parents will always be in the child’s best interests. Each case must be determined according to its own facts and the guiding principle when the Court makes parenting orders is always the child’s best interests.

If you are interested in making an application for parenting orders and you are not the child’s biological or adopted parent, please contact Anthi Balafas of Rockliffs Lawyers on (02) 9299 4912 to discuss your matter.

Author: Anthi Balafas

Primary Sidebar

Search

Categories

  • Wills & Estate Planning
  • Insurance Law
  • General Legal Services
  • Divorce & Family Law
  • Debt Recovery
  • Civil Disputes & Litigation
  • Business & Commercial
  • Building & Construction
  • Bankruptcy & Insolvency
  • General
  • Uncategorised
  • Taxation
  • Superannuation
  • Services
  • Property & Conveyancing
  • Probate, Estate Administration & Disputes
  • News
  • Employment Law

Online Enquiry

* indicates required field

News & Articles

Managing Employees in Australia given the Impact of COVID-19

  We stress that due to the unprecedented nature of the pandemic and the very rapidly changing landscape, the guidelines below are general in nature and subject to change. Many of the laws that now apply to this situation were not written with regard to what is currently occurring. Therefore please exercise caution in relying […]

Temporary Changes to Insolvency Laws in Australia due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Crisis

In a move aimed to lessen the economic impact on businesses and individuals caused by the Coronavirus pandemic, the Australian Government has introduced some changes to insolvency laws in Australia that apply to personal and corporate insolvency regimes. This includes a temporary increase to the threshold in which creditors can issue a statutory demand on […]

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update

Following on from the extensive reporting in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic we have implemented a number of protocols to enable the business to continue operating if a staff member or principal is diagnosed with the virus and/or the office needs to close for a period of time. Our staff and principals have adopted best […]

Footer

The Rockliffs Lawyers Difference

We provide pragmatic and practical solutions to your legal needs
We have decades of combined experience
Our lawyers and consultants are experts in their field to enable us to give you tailored legal advice to suit your specific needs

Contact Us

  • Suite 14, Level 26, 44 Market St Sydney NSW 2000
  • (02) 9299 4912

Connect With Us

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter for updates on our latest news, articles and special promotions!

Our website does not give legal advice. All materials are for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as legal advice. The use of this website is subject to our:
WEBSITE DISCLAIMER – PRIVACY POLICY – TERMS & CONDITIONS OF USE
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.Copyright © 2020 · Website hosted by Lift Legal Marketing · Log out